The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood — www.cbmw.org

Eternal Subordination of the Son: The Basics, Part IV

Tools:
Jeff Robinson
February 21, 2008

As Shawn Wright pointed out on Gender Blog recently, church history is neither authoritative nor decisive in establishing correct doctrine. Most evangelicals are "people of the book," and thus hold firmly to the formal principle of the Protestant Reformation, sola scriptura or "scripture alone" as their sole source of authority. 

But church history is by no means unimportant in the discussion of doctrine. After all, we are not the first Christians who have wrestled with the proper interpretation of Scripture as evidenced by thousands who have written on Christian doctrine and practice. Likewise, we are not the first Christians to see an intra-trinitarian authority/submission structure in Scripture.

Egalitarians often argue that the doctrine of the Son's eternal submission is akin to the heresy of Arian subordination that was condemned in the early church. Arius argued that the Son was a created being and that "there was a time when he was not;" in other words, there was a time when the Son did not exist. This heresy (which lives today and is seen most clearly in the teachings of the Watchtower Society) viewed the Son as ontologically inferior to the Father; that is, the Son was not equal in essence to the Father.

The doctrine under consideration in this series, however, must not be confused with the heresy of Arius and others. The orthodox view of subordination has been affirmed by many in the mainstream of orthodoxy throughout church history, including: 

For further study:


Part 1  Part 2  Part 3  Part 4  Part 5