Last fall, the Fellowship of Independent Evangelical Churches (FIEC) reaffirmed its complementarian policy on women in ministry and its board of trustees agreed to refer inquiries on the issue to the Danvers Statement on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood.

Richard Underwood, general secretary of the FIEC, said the denomination’s stance on gender roles is consistent with the Danvers Statement, composed by The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW).

"In October last year, the council of the FIEC--our trustees--reaffirmed our policy in this area which was expressed in a booklet entitled ‘Women in Ministry’ which had been approved at the Assembly in 1995," Underwood said.

"However, it also agreed that inquirers could be informed of the existence of the Danvers Statement, published by the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, which expressed a similar viewpoint on the subject."

The FIEC is a group of independent, evangelical churches based in England with affiliated churches existing in Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales. The denomination’s total membership is nearly 22,000 with more than 30,000 attending the main services of the churches.

The denomination is committed to the historic evangelical view of gender roles in the home and church and also articulates a robust vision for the service of women in the church.

"We uphold the Biblical perspective that God calls men to the primary leadership role in family and church," reads part of the FIEC website’s statement on women in the ministry.

"Within that framework, we believe that women have been gifted with all sorts of complementary gifts, and that our churches are poorer if these gifts are not developed and used. We wish to encourage women in the very many ministries to which they are called, and share examples of how these ministries are working out in practice."

To learn more about the FIEC or to locate its affiliate churches, please see http://www.fiec.org.uk.

Contemporary culture may teach young boys that they need to work hard only at mastering the controls on their Xbox, but a new book argues that a strenuous, joyful work ethic is a critical plank in the foundation that underpins a robust, biblical manhood.

In Created For Work: Practical Insights for Young Men (Great Expectations, 2006), carpenter, father and author Bob Schultz demonstrates that God’s standard for young men calls for dirt under the fingernails instead of a comfortable seat in front of the television.

"Modern culture seems addicted to ease and entertainment," the book’s back cover reads. "It has produced a generation of educated, yet often dishonest, unproductive, and weak-willed men. God desires higher standards for His people. He is looking for young men who do not shy away from hard work, who are not afraid to get their hands dirty, who can follow directions, think creatively, respect authority, and happily complete their duties in a timely manner."

Using Scripture and illustrations from everyday life, Schultz demonstrates how a young man shines forth the image of God most clearly when he is diligently and joyfully learning how to work. Work is not a part of the curse of Adam, but is instead a God-ordained classroom in which young boys learn to be honest, godly leaders of homes and churches, Schultz asserts.
"In the education of boys today, we’ve lost the importance of work as a most effective tutor," Schultz writes. What is the good of knowing how to read or write if a young man doesn’t have the heart to work, to produce, and to create? Boys are often forced to sit for hours, year after year, in front of books. Modern child-labor laws hinder and even prevent them from learning to enjoy strenuous work. And then, after twelve to sixteen years of inactivity, folks wonder why all their teenager wants to do is sit on the couch playing games.

"A boy who loves to work will master math when it’s needed. He’ll put out the effort to read what’s important. In the meantime, his interaction with things that are "actual and practical" will provide the wisdom he needs to direct him into useful pursuits, and empower him to provide for a family of his own in days to come."

Schultz deals with a myriad of work-related, boy-related issues from a biblical perspective. For example, he shows that a young man honors God in His work when he approaches every task, no matter how menial, with joy and conscientiousness.

He also warns against the danger of hyper-industriousness in which work is transformed from a set of tasks done with joy to the glory God into a golden calf that is worshiped in the place of the Creator.

"The grand quality of diligence, which is essential when you begin working, turns a man into a workaholic if not balanced," he writes. "The freedoms that bless the industrious become snares when given to selfish pleasure. The diligent are tempted to forget God, trust in riches, and look down on the poor. What once was the reward of hard work quickly transforms resources to fulfill the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life. Be on guard."

"God designs the diligent to collect resources and talents with the goal to use them in an appropriate season for good. As always, Jesus leads us by His example."

Jesus, though he had all the resources in the universe at His disposal, did not use them for his own pleasure, but used them to redeem sinners, Schultz writes. In the same way, young men should use their talents and resources to the glory of God.

Schultz is also author of the 2004 title by Great Expectations, Boyhood and Beyond: Practical Wisdom for Becoming a Man. Both books are available through the CBMW web store at www.cbmw.org/store.

As illustrated children's books go, "King & King" starts off innocently enough: "On the tallest mountain above the town lived a queen, the young prince, and the crown kitty. The queen had ruled for many long years and she was tired of it."

The queen, it seems, wanted to step down so that her son could become king. First, though, she wanted him to find a wife. So a search ensued -- far and wide -- for the perfect princess.

But in the end he chose none of them, instead opting for another prince. (Yes, a prince.) The short 29-page book ends with a "gay wedding," the proverbial kiss, the queen shedding a tear of joy and, the reader is told, the two men living "happily ever after."

King & King, a slick colorful book aimed at children 6 and up, was at the heart of a controversy in North Carolina when a first-grade girl checked it out of her public school library -- much to her parents' dismay.

"I was flabbergasted," her father, Michael Hartsell, told the Associated Press. "My child is not old enough to understand something like that, especially when it is not in our beliefs."

And conservatives say the book is only the tip of the iceberg in the nationwide debate over homosexuality in the public schools. Homosexual activists have made significant inroads in recent years, and their advances have come in both big- and small-town America. For instance:

-- More than 3,000 schools in all 50 states have Gay/Straight Alliance Clubs, student-led groups set up to promote homosexual issues within the schools. Many are in middle schools. The Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a national homosexual activist organization, is the primary catalyst.

-- The public school system in Boyd County, Ky., allegedly forced middle and high school students to participate in diversity and tolerance training, telling them homosexuality cannot be changed and warning them not to say otherwise. The Alliance Defense Fund, a pro-family legal organization, filed a federal lawsuit in February on behalf of concerned parents.

-- The Montgomery County, Md., public school system developed sexual-education curriculum for eighth- and 10th-graders which claimed that Jesus "said absolutely nothing at all about homosexuality" and that being homosexual is similar to being left-handed. It also noted that some Baptist churches once defended racial segregation -- implying that conservative Baptists today are wrong in opposing homosexuality. The pro-family legal group Liberty Counsel filed suit on behalf of two conservative groups and concerned parents, and in May a federal judge ruled against the school system, preventing the course from going into effect.

"Many of the leaders of the homosexual lobbying groups have admitted that they're targeting public schools," Mike Johnson, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, told Baptist Press. "That is where they're trying to change society's perception of their activities and their behavior. That's the best place to do it -- to go to the next generation. That's how you change minds and that's how you affect the culture. Sadly, they've had some success there."

The cases, Johnson said, are "spreading gradually like mushrooms across the country."

Two homosexual groups -- GLSEN and the Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians & Gays (PFLAG) -- have led the charge in pressuring schools to allow Gay/Straight Alliance Clubs and introduce homosexuality-friendly curriculum. When schools don't respond favorably, liberal groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and Lambda Legal often file lawsuits.

The National Education Association also has been at the forefront of the homosexual movement, although public outcry has prevented it from going further. At its annual meeting in 2001, the NEA -- in the face of protesters -- backed off a resolution that would have encouraged teachers to adopt homosexuality-friendly curriculum, including teaching students that homosexuality cannot be changed. The resolution did not receive a vote. But the NEA hasn't remained silent regarding the homosexual agenda, and last year gave GLSEN co-founder and Executive Director Kevin Jennings an award for promoting human rights.

Conservatives assert that school systems mask homosexuality-friendly curriculum in words like "tolerance" and "diversity" in an attempt to avoid controversy. But the curriculum often is one-sided.

"[I]t's not really about tolerance. It's about political correctness, and it's about forced acceptance of homosexuality as a valid alternative lifestyle,"

Scott Davis, director of Exodus Youth at Exodus International, told Baptist Press. Exodus International is a Christian organization that teaches that homosexuality can be changed.

"[The curriculum] is really confusing our kids -- kids at a very vulnerable stage," Davis added. "... It's encouraging them to explore and experiment ... at a time that is just developmentally inappropriate."

Educators often defend homosexuality-friendly curriculum by saying it is necessary in order to protect students from violence. But Warren Throckmorton, an associate professor of psychology at Grove City College in Pennsylvania, said the curriculum is not needed to discourage violence and bullying.

"I've gone into public schools myself and spoken against bullying. I tend not to identity victim groups, and I think that the best bullying policies don't do that," he said. "I think we should make it clear that schools should be safe for all. ... The schools have mistakenly believed that you have to promote one view of homosexuality ... in order to try and get an environment of tolerance and respect. And that's just not the case."

Throckmorton said the biblical view -- that homosexuals can change -- is mostly ignored.

"The theory about homosexuality that most schools put forward is that homosexuality is inborn, that it's a hard-wired trait and that in high school you can know who you are by your sexual feelings," he said. "Kids are told who they are and who they'll always be. But that's a theory. That's not a fact."

The legalization of "gay marriage" likely would make matters only worse for conservatives.

"I think Massachusetts is a pretty good example of that," Throckmorton said.

In Lexington, Mass. -- where "gay marriage" is legal -- a kindergarten class was given a bag of books earlier this year with the goal of teaching the children diversity. One of the books was "Who's In a Family," a 29-page illustrated children's book that includes illustrations of homosexual parents. In one scene, two men and a little girl are preparing to eat dinner. The reader is told: "Robin's family is made up of her dad, Clifford, her dad's partner, Henry, and Robin's cat, Sassy." In another scene, a young girl and boy and two women play outside in the pool, under the caption, "Laura and Kyle live with their two moms, Joyce and Emily, and a poodle named Daisy."

Alarmed by what his son was being taught in the Lexington, Mass., school, one father met with school officials and then was arrested after he refused to leave the building. He said officials declined to let him have a say in the matter.

"I think parents are often surprised by what they find at school," Throckmorton said.

Homosexual groups promote their agenda in other ways as well. Teachers friendly to the homosexual movement often place inverted pink triangles in their classroom, identifying their room as a "safe zone" for homosexuals. In addition, each year GLSEN sponsors the "Day of Silence," a day when thousands of students nationwide take a vow of silence to protest what they see as discrimination against homosexuals.

This year the Alliance Defense Fund countered with the "Day of Truth," allowing Christian students to stand up for their beliefs. Participants wore T-shirts stating, "The Truth Cannot Be Silenced" and passed out cards expressing their viewpoint. It was held the day after the Day of Silence.

Johnson, the Alliance Defense Fund attorney, said much can be done to oppose homosexual curriculum in public schools, although little can be done to prevent Gay/Straight Alliance Clubs from forming.

"You can't really oppose it if we're going to maintain equal access," he said of the clubs. "If we target those groups, then they'll target the Bible clubs and the Christian groups."

But, Johnson and other conservatives say, parents do have a great deal of influence in deciding what their children are taught. The Maryland case, they say, is one example.

"Parents have a tremendous amount of power within the public schools," Davis said. " ... Parents have the authority and the rights legally to go in and investigate the curriculum to find out exactly what their kids are being taught. I would encourage any parent to ask their kids what they're being taught about this. I bet they'd be surprised."

Said Throckmorton: "Their options range from fighting the school district on this to bringing this to the school district's attention all the way to considering other educational options. We've seen some parents win some battles."

[This story originally appeared in Baptist Press]

Another CBMW resource was added this week to the growing list of complementarian works translated in a foreign language.

The work Fifty Crucial Questions: An Overview of Central Concerns about Manhood and Womanhood by John Piper and Wayne Grudem, is now available online through The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW) website in Dutch. The CBMW-published booklet is adapted from the larger volume Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood and offers an overview of the complementarian vision of manhood and womanhood. Fifty Crucial Questions offers cogent summary responses to the most common objections to the complementarian view of manhood and womanhood.

The Dutch translation was produced by Newfrontiers Nederland. The group plans to distribute the work in booklet form to Newfrontiers churches in Holland. The translation was made by Lydie Geurts and Esther Hurter.

The Dutch edition of Fifty Crucial Questions is available in PDF format (http://www.cbmw.org/resources/multilingual.php?langid=10) along with other multilingual resources on the CBMW website at www.cbmw.org/resources/multilangual.